How Do You Know if You Have Covid but No Symptoms

Authored by Kit Knightly via Off-Guardian.org,

You asked for it, so we made information technology. A collection of all the arguments y'all'll always demand.

We go a lot of due east-mails and private messages along these lines"practice you take a source for X?" or"can you point me to mask studies?" or"I know I saw a graph for mortality, simply I can't find it anymore". And we sympathize, it's been a long 18 months, and there are so many statistics and numbers to endeavor and proceed straight in your head.

So, to deal with all these requests, we decided to make a bullet-pointed and sourced listing for all the cardinal points. A one-stop-store.

Here are key facts and sources about the declared "pandemic", that volition help you get a grasp on what has happened to the world since January 2020, and help yous enlighten whatsoever of your friends who might be still trapped in the New Normal fog: "Covid deaths" – Lockdowns – PCR Tests – "asymptomatic infection" – Ventilators – Masks – Vaccines – Deception & Foreknowledge

*  *  *

Role I: "COVID DEATHS" & MORTALITY

1. The survival rate of "Covid" is over 99%. Regime medical experts went out of their style to underline, from the showtime of the pandemic, thatthe vast majority of the population are non in any danger from Covid.

Near all studies on the infection-fatality ratio (IFR) of Covid have returned results between 0.04% and 0.5%. Meaning Covid'southward survival rate is at to the lowest degree 99.5%.

*

2. There has been NO unusual excess mortality. The printing has chosen 2020 the Britain's "deadliest yr since world state of war two", simply this is misleading considering information technology ignores the massive increase in the population since that fourth dimension. A more than reasonable statistical measure of bloodshed is Age-Standardised Bloodshed Rate (ASMR):

Past this measure, 2020 isn't even the worst year for mortalitysince 2000, In fact since 1943only ix years take been better than 2020.

Similarly, in the US the ASMR for 2020 is only at 2004 levels:

For a detailed breakdown of how Covid affected mortality across Western Europe and the U.s. click here. What increases in bloodshed we have seen could be attributable to not-Covid causes [facts 7, 9 & nineteen].

*

three. "Covid decease" counts are artificially inflated. Countries around the world have been defining a "Covid death" as a"deathby whatsoever cause inside 28/30/60 days of a positive test".

Healthcare officials from Italia, Germany, the UK, United states of america, Northern Ireland and others have all admitted to this practice:

Removing whatsoever stardom betwixt dyingof Covid, and dying of something elseafterwards testing positive for Covid will naturally pb to over-counting of "Covid deaths". British pathologist Dr John Lee was warning of this "substantial over-estimate" as early on as terminal jump. Other mainstream sources accept reported information technology, too.

Considering the huge percentage of "asymptomatic" Covid infections [xiv], the well-known prevalence of serious comorbidities [fact iv] and the potential for false-positive tests [fact 18], this renders the Covid decease numbers an extremely unreliable statistic.

*

4. The vast majority of covid deaths have serious comorbidities. In March 2020, the Italian authorities published statistics showing 99.ii% of their "Covid deaths" had at least ane serious comorbidity.

These included cancer, heart disease, dementia, Alzheimer's, kidney failure and diabetes (among others). Over 50% of them hadthree or more serious pre-existing conditions.

This pattern has held up in all other countries over the form of the "pandemic". An October 2020 FOIA asking to the United kingdom's ONS revealed less than ten% of the official "Covid death" count at that time had Covid as the sole cause of decease.

*

5. Average age of "Covid death" is greater than the average life expectancy. The average historic period of a "Covid death" in the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland is 82.5 years. In Italy it's 86. Germany, 83. Switzerland, 86. Canada, 86. The US, 78, Australia, 82.

In almost all cases the median age of a "Covid death"is higher than the national life expectancy.

Every bit such, for almost of the world, the "pandemic" has had trivial-to-no impact on life expectancy. Contrast this with the Spanish flu, which saw a 28% drop in life expectancy in the United states of america in just over a year. [source]

*

vi. Covid mortality exactly mirrors the natural bloodshed curve. Statistical studies from the Great britain and Bharat have shown that the curve for "Covid death" follows the bend for expected mortality almost exactly:

The risk of expiry "from Covid" follows, about exactly, your background risk of death in full general.

The small increase for some of the older age groups tin be accounted for by other factors.[facts 7, nine & 19]

*

7. At that place has been a massive increase in the apply of "unlawful" DNRs. Watchdogs and authorities agencies have reported huge increases in the use of Exercise Non Resuscitate Orders (DNRs) over the last twenty months.

In the U.s.a., hospitals considered "universal DNRs" for whatsoever patient who tested positive for Covid, and whistleblowing nurses take admitted the DNR organisation was abused in New York.

In the UK there was an "unprecdented" rise in "illegal" DNRs for disabled people, GP surgeries sent out messages to non-final patients recommending they sign DNR orders, whilst other doctors signed "blanket DNRs" forentire nursing homes.

A report done by Sheffield Univerisity institute over one-3rd of all "suspected" Covid patients had a DNR attached to their file inside 24 hours of hospital admission.

Blanket use of coerced or illegal DNR orders could account for any increases in bloodshed in 2020/21.[Facts 2 & 6]

*  *  *

Role II: LOCKDOWNS

8. Lockdowns do non prevent the spread of illness. There is little to no bear witness lockdowns have any impact on limiting "Covid deaths". If you compare regions that locked down to regions that did not, you can run across no pattern at all.

"Covid deaths" in Florida (no lockdown) vs California (lockdown)

"Covid deaths" in Sweden (no lockdown) vs United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland (lockdown)

*

nine. Lockdowns kill people. There is strong bear witness that lockdowns – through social, economical and other public wellness damage – are deadlier than the "virus".

Dr David Nabarro, World Health Organization special envoy for Covid-19 described lockdowns as a "global catastrophe" in October 2020:

We inthe Earth Wellness Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the principal means of control of the virus[…] it seems we may have a doubling of world poverty by next twelvemonth. We may well have at to the lowest degree a doubling of child malnutrition […] This is a terrible, ghastly global catastrophe."

A United nations written report from April 2020 warned of 100,000s of children being killed past the economic impact of lockdowns, while tens of millions more face possible poverty and famine.

Unemployment, poverty, suicide, alcoholism, drug use and other social/mental health crises are spiking all over the world. While missed and delayed surgeries and screenings are going to encounter increased mortality from center disease, cancer et al. in the about future.

The impact of lockdown would account for the small increases in excess mortality [Facts ii & half dozen]

*

10. Hospitals were never unusually over-encumbered. the main argument used to defend lockdowns is that "flattening the curve" would foreclose a rapid influx of cases and protect healthcare systems from collapse. Merely most healthcare systems were never close to collapse at all.

In March 2020 it was reported that hospitals in Spain and Italy were over-flowing with patients, only this happens every influenza flavour. In 2017 Spanish hospitals were at 200% capacity, and 2015 saw patients sleeping in corridors. A paper JAMA paper from March 2020 establish that Italian hospitals"typically run at 85-90% chapters in the winter months".

In the UK, the NHS is regularly stretched to breaking point over the winter.

As part of their Covid policy, the NHS announced in Spring of 2020 that they would be"re-organizing hospital capacity in new means to treat Covid and non-Covid patients separately" and that "as upshot hospitals will experience capacity pressures at lower overall occupancy rates than would previously accept been the instance."

This means they removed thousands of beds.  During an alleged mortiferous pandemic, they reduced the maximum occupancy of hospitals. Despite this, the NHS never felt pressure beyond your typical flu season, and at times actually had 4x more empty beds than normal.

In both the UK and United states millions were spent on temporary emergency hospitals that were never used.

*  *  *

Office Three: PCR TESTS

11. PCR tests were not designed to diagnose illness. The Opposite-Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) test is described in the media as the "gold standard" for Covid diagnosis. But the Nobel Prize-winning inventor of the process never intended it to be used as a diagnostic tool, and said so publicly:

PCR is just a procedure that allows you to make a whole lot of something out of something. It doesn't tell y'all that you lot are sick, or that the matter that you ended upward with was going to injure you or anything like that."

*

12. PCR Tests have a history of being inaccurate and unreliable. The "gold standard" PCR tests for Covid are known to produce a lot of fake-positive results, by reacting to DNA material that is non specific to Sars-Cov-2.

A Chinese study found the same patient could get ii dissimilar results from the same examination on the aforementioned twenty-four hours. In Germany, tests are known to have reacted to mutual cold viruses. A 2006 study plant PCR tests for i virus responded to other viruses as well. In 2007, a reliance on PCR tests resulted in an "outbreak" of Whooping Cough that never actually existed. Some tests in the US fifty-fifty reacted to the negative command sample.

The late President of Tanzania, John Magufuli, submitted samples goat, pawpaw and motor oil for PCR testing, all came dorsum positive for the virus.

Every bit early on as February of 2020 experts were admitting the exam was unreliable. Dr Wang Cheng, president of the Chinese University of Medical Sciences told Chinese state television"The accuracy of the tests is only 30-50%". The Australian regime's ain website claimed"There is limited evidence available to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of bachelor COVID-19 tests." And a Portuguese court ruled that PCR tests were"unreliable" and should not be used for diagnosis.

Y'all tin read detailed breakdowns of the failings of PCR tests here, here and here.

*

13. The CT values of the PCR tests are too high. PCR tests are run in cycles, the number of cycles you use to get your effect is known as your "wheel threshold" or CT value. Kary Mullis said:"If you have to get more than xl cycles[…]in that location is something seriously wrong with your PCR."

The MIQE PCR guidelines concur, stating:"[CT] values higher than 40 are suspect because of the implied low efficiency and generally should not be reported," Dr Fauci himself even admitted anything over 35 cycles is almost never culturable.

Dr Juliet Morrison, virologist at the University of California, Riverside, told the New York Times:Whatever test with a cycle threshold above 35 is too sensitive…I'k shocked that people would remember that forty [cycles] could represent a positive…A more than reasonable cutoff would be 30 to 35″.

In the same article Dr Michael Mina, of the Harvard School of Public Health, said the limit should be 30, and the author goes on to point out that reducing the CT from 40 to thirty would accept reduced "covid cases" in some states by every bit much every bit xc%.

The CDC's ain data suggests no sample over 33 cycles could be cultured, and Germany'southward Robert Koch Institute says nothing over 30 cycles is likely to exist infectious.

Despite this, information technology is known almost all the labs in the US are running their tests at least 37 cycles and sometimes as high as 45. The NHS "standard operating procedure" for PCR tests rules gear up the limit at xl cycles.

Based on what we know about the CT values, the majority of PCR exam results are at all-time questionable.

*

14. The World Wellness Organization (Twice) Admitted PCR tests produced simulated positives.In December 2020 WHO put out a conference memo on the PCR process instructing labs to be wary of high CT values causing false positive results:

when specimens return a high Ct value, information technology means that many cycles were required to discover virus. In some circumstances, the stardom between groundwork noise and actual presence of the target virus is hard to ascertain.

Then, in January 2021, the WHO released some other memo, this time warning that "asymptomatic" positive PCR tests should exist re-tested because they might be false positives:

Where test results do non correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.

*

fifteen. The scientific footing for Covid tests is questionable. The genome of the Sars-Cov-ii virus was supposedly sequenced by Chinese scientists in December 2019, and so published on January 10th 2020. Less than ii weeks afterward, German virologists (Christian Drosten et al.) had allegedly used the genome to create assays for PCR tests.

They wrote a paper,Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by existent-time RT-PCR, which was submitted for publication on Jan 21st 2020, and and so accepted on Jan 22nd. Significant the paper wasallegedly "peer-reviewed" in less than 24 hours. A process that typically takes weeks.

Since then, a consortium of over 40 life scientists has petitioned for the withdrawal of the paper, writing a lengthy report detailing ten major errors in the newspaper's methodology.

They take also requested the release of the periodical'southward peer-review study, to show the paper really did pass through the peer-review process. The journal has yet to comply.

The Corman-Drosten assays are the root of every Covid PCR test in the world. If the paper is questionable, every PCR test is also questionable.

*  *  *

PART IV: "ASYMPTOMATIC INFECTION"

16. The majority of Covid infections are "asymptomatic". From equally early on every bit March 2020, studies done in Italia were suggesting 50-75% of positive Covid tests had no symptoms. Another United kingdom written report from August 2020 establish equally much every bit 86% of "Covid patients"experienced no viral symptoms at all.

It is literally impossible to tell the difference between an "asymptomatic case" and a false-positive test issue.

*

17. There is very trivial evidence supporting the alleged danger of "asymptomatic transmission". In June 2020, Dr Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the WHO'south emerging diseases and zoonosis unit of measurement, said:

From the data we have, it however seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual,"

A meta-analysis of Covid studies, published past Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) in December 2020, found that asymptomatic carriers had a less than 1% adventure of infecting people within their household. Another study, washed on flu in 2009, found:

…limited evidence to suggest the importance of [asymptomatic] transmission. The function of asymptomatic or presymptomatic influenza-infected individuals in disease manual may have been overestimated…"

Given the known flaws of the PCR tests, many "asymptomatic cases" may exist imitation positives.[fact xiv]

*  *  *

Role V: VENTILATORS

18. Ventilation is NOT a treatment for respiratory viruses. Mechanical ventilation is not, and never has been, recommended treatment for respiratory infection of whatever kind. In the early days of the pandemic, many doctors came forrard questioning the use of ventilators to treat "Covid".

Writing in The Spectator, Dr Matt Strauss stated:

Ventilators exercise not cure any disease. They can make full your lungs with air when you find yourself unable to practice and then yourself. They are associated with lung diseases in the public'due south consciousness, but this is not in fact their most common or most appropriate application.

German Pulmonologist Dr Thomas Voshaar, chairman of Clan of Pneumatological Clinics said:

When we read the outset studies and reports from Prc and Italian republic, we immediately asked ourselves why intubation was so common there.This contradicted our clinical experience with viral pneumonia.

Despite this, the WHO, CDC, ECDC and NHS all "recommended" Covid patients be ventilated instead of using not-invasive methods.

This was not a medical policy designed to best care for the patients, but rather to reduce the hypothetical spread of Covid past preventing patients from exhaling aerosol droplets.

*

nineteen. Ventilators killed people. Putting someone who is suffering from flu, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or whatsoever other condition which restricts animate or affects the lungs, will not convalesce whatsoever of those symptoms. In fact, it will almost certainly make it worse, and volition impale many of them.

Intubation tubes are a source of potential a infection known every bit "ventilator-associated pneumonia", which studies testify affects up to 28% of all people put on ventilators, and kills xx-55% of those infected.

Mechanical ventilation is also damaging to the physical structure of the lungs, resulting in "ventilator-induced lung injury", which tin dramatically impact quality of life, and even issue in death.

Experts estimate 40-fifty% of ventilated patients dice, regardless of their disease. Around the world, between 66 and 86% of all "Covid patients" put on ventilators died.

Co-ordinate to the "undercover nurse", ventilators were being used then improperly in New York, they were destroying patients' lungs:

This policy was negligence at all-time, and potentially deliberate murder at worst. This misuse of ventilators could account for whatever increase in bloodshed in 2020/21 [Facts 2 & 6]

*  *  *

PART 6: MASKS

20. Masks don't work. At to the lowest degree a dozen scientific studies have shown that masks do zero to finish the spread of respiratory viruses.

One meta-analysis published by the CDC in May 2020 found"no significant reduction in influenza manual with the use of confront masks".

Another study with over 8000 subjects institute masks"did not seem to exist constructive confronting laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections nor against clinical respiratory infection."

In that location are literally too many to quote them all, merely you can read them: [1][ii][3][four][v][half-dozen][7][viii][9][10] Or read a summary by SPR here.

While some studies accept been done challenge to show mask do piece of work for Covid, they are all seriously flawed. 1 relied on self-reported surveys as data. Another was so badly designed a panel of experts demand it be withdrawn. A third was withdrawn after its predictions proved entirely incorrect.

The WHO commissioned their ain meta-assay in the Lancet, only that study looked only at N95 masks and but in hospitals. [For total run down on the bad information in this report click hither.]

Aside from scientific evidence, there's enough of real-earth evidence that masks exercise nothing to halt the spread of disease.

For example, Northward Dakota and S Dakota had near-identical example figures, despite one having a mask-mandate and the other not:

In Kansas, counties without mask mandates actually had fewer Covid "cases" than countieswith mask mandates. And despite masks being very common in Japan, they had their worst flu outbreak in decades in 2019.

*

21. Masks are bad for your health. Wearing a mask for long periods, wearing the aforementioned mask more than than once, and other aspects of cloth masks can be bad for your wellness. A long written report on the detrimental effects of mask-wearing was recently published by theInternational Journal of Ecology Research and Public Health

Dr. James Meehan reported in August 2020 he was seeing increases in bacterial pneumonia, fungal infections, facial rashes .

Masks are also known to contain plastic microfibers, which damage the lungs when inhaled and may be potentially carcinogenic.

Childen wearing masks encourages mouth-breathing, which results in facial deformities.

People effectually the world have passed out due to CO2 poisoning while wearing their masks, and some children in China even suffered sudden cardiac arrest.

*

22. Masks are bad for the planet. Millions upon millions of dispensable masks accept been used per month for over a year. A written report from the UN found the Covid19 pandemic will likely result in plastic waste more than doubling in the side by side few years., and the vast bulk of that is face masks.

The report goes on to warn these masks (and other medical waste material) will clog sewage and irrigation systems, which will take knock on effects on public health, irrigation and agriculture.

A study from the University of Swansea plant"heavy metals and plastic fibres were released when throw-away masks were submerged in water." These materials are toxic to both people and wild animals.

*  *  *

Function Vii: VACCINES

23. Covid "vaccines" are totally unprecedented. Earlier 2020 no successful vaccine against a human coronavirus had ever been developed. Since and then we take allegedlyfabricated xx of them in 18 months.

Scientists accept been trying to develop a SARS and MERS vaccine for years with little success. Some of the failed SARS vaccines actually caused hypersensitivity to the SARS virus. Meaning that vaccinated mice could potentially get the diseasemore than severely than unvaccinated mice. Another try acquired liver harm in ferrets.

While traditional vaccines work by exposing the torso to a weakened strain of the microorganism responsible for causing the illness, these new Covid vaccines are mRNA vaccines.

mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid) vaccines theoretically work by injecting viral mRNA into the torso, where it replicates within your cells and encourages your body to recognise, and brand antigens for, the "fasten proteins" of the virus. They have been the subject of enquiry since the 1990s, but before 2020 no mRNA vaccine was ever approved for use.

*

24. Vaccines exercise not confer immunity or prevent transmission. It is readily admitted that Covid "vaccines" practisenon confer immunity from infection and donon prevent you from passing the disease onto others. Indeed, an commodity in the British Medical Journal highlighted that the vaccine studies were not designed to fifty-fifty try and assess if the "vaccines" limited transmission.

The vaccine manufacturers themselves, upon releasing the untested mRNA gene therapies, were quite clear their product'southward "efficacy" was based on "reducing the severity of symptoms".

*

25. The vaccines were rushed and have unknown longterm furnishings.Vaccine development is a slow, laborious procedure. Normally, from development through testing and finally being approved for public utilize takes many years. The various vaccines for Covid were all developed and approved in less than a year. Obviously in that location tin can be no long-term safety data on chemicals which are less than a year onetime.

Pfizer fifty-fifty acknowledge this is true in the leaked supply contract between the pharmaceutical giant, and the government of Albania:

the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that in that location may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known

Further, none of the vaccines have been subject to proper trials. Many of them skipped early-stage trials entirely, and the late-stage human trials have either not been peer-reviewed, have not released their information, will not finish until 2023 or were abandoned subsequently "severe adverse effects".

*

26. Vaccine manufacturers take been granted legal indemnity should they cause harm. The USA's Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP) grants immunity until at least 2024.

The European union's product licensing law does the aforementioned, and at that place are reports of confidential liability clauses in the contracts the EU signed with vaccine manufacturers.

The Great britain went even farther, granting permanent legal indemnity to the government, and any employees thereof, for any impairment washed when a patient is being treated for Covid19 or "suspected Covid19".

Again, the leaked Albanian contract suggests that Pfizer, at least, fabricated this indemnity a standard demand of supplying Covid vaccines:

Purchaser hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Pfizer […] from and against whatever and all suits, claims, actions, demands, losses, damages, liabilities, settlements, penalties, fines, costs and expenses

*  *  *

PART VIII: Charade & FOREKNOWLEDGE

27. The EU was preparing "vaccine passports" at to the lowest degree a Year before the pandemic began. Proposed COVID countermeasures, presented to the public equally improvised emergency measures, accept existed since before the emergence of the illness.

Two European union documents published in 2018, the"2018 State of Vaccine Confidence" and a technical written report titled"Designing and implementing an immunisation information system" discussed the plausibility of an Eu-wide vaccination monitoring system.

These documents were combined into the 2019 "Vaccination Roadmap", which (amid other things) established a "feasibility report" on vaccine passports to begin in 2019 and finish in 2021:

This report's final conclusions were released to the public in September 2019, just a calendar month before Upshot 201 (below).

*

28. A "training do" predicted the pandemic just weeks before information technology started. In October 2019 the Earth Economical Forum and Johns Hopkins University held Result 201. This was a preparation do based on a zoonotic coronavirus starting a worldwide pandemic. The exercise was sponsored past the Neb and Melinda Gates Foundation and GAVI the vaccine alliance.

The practise published its findings and recommendations in Nov 2019 equally a "call to action". 1 calendar month after, Cathay recorded their first case of "Covid".

*

29. Since the beginning of 2020, the Flu has "disappeared". In the U.s.a., since Februart 2020, influenza cases accept allegedly dropped by over 98%.

Information technology's non just the U.s.a. either, globally flu has manifestly well-nigh completely disappeared.

Meanwhile, a new disease called "Covid", which has identical symptoms and a similar mortality rate to influenza, is supposedly sweeping the globe.

*

30. The aristocracy accept made fortunes during the pandemic. Since the beginning of lockdown the wealthiest people have get significantly wealthier. Forbes reported that xl new billionaires have been created "fighting the coronavirus", with 9 of them being vaccine manufacturers.

Business Insider reported that"billionaires saw their cyberspace worth increase by half a trillion dollars" past October 2020.

Clearly that number volition be even bigger past now.

*  *  *

These are the vital facts of the pandemic, presented here every bit a resources to assist formulate and back up your arguments with friends or strangers. Thanks to all the researchers who accept collated and nerveless this information over the last twenty months, especially Swiss Policy Research.

holmanconven.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/30-facts-you-need-know-covid-cribsheet

Share this post